Friday, February 13, 2026
HomeUncategorizedChina Prohibits Hidden Car Door Handles, Citing Safety Risks

China Prohibits Hidden Car Door Handles, Citing Safety Risks

China’s market regulator has issued a nationwide ban on the use of concealed door‑handle designs in passenger vehicles, marking the first time a country has moved to restrict a feature that gained prominence through Elon Musk’s Tesla models.

Regulatory Rationale

The Ministry of Industry and Information Technology (MIIT) cited “significant safety concerns” after a series of crash tests revealed that hidden handles can impede rapid egress during emergencies, especially in side‑impact collisions. The agency’s directive mandates that all new vehicles sold in China from July 1 must feature externally visible, operable door handles that meet the nation’s mandatory safety standards.

Impact on Automakers

Domestic manufacturers such as BYD, NIO and Xpeng, as well as foreign brands operating in the Chinese market, will need to redesign current and upcoming models to comply. Industry analysts estimate that re‑engineering costs could run into hundreds of millions of dollars, potentially delaying the launch of flagship electric‑vehicle (EV) line‑ups slated for the second half of the year.

Tesla’s Response

Tesla, whose Model S and Model X popularised the flush‑handle aesthetic, released a statement acknowledging the ban and confirming that its China‑produced vehicles will be equipped with compliant handles for the local market. The company added that safety remains a core priority and that alternative design solutions are under evaluation.

Broader Implications

The prohibition underscores a growing regulatory focus on occupant safety amid the rapid expansion of EVs and advanced vehicle styling. Observers note that China’s move could set a precedent for other jurisdictions grappling with the balance between innovative design and crash‑worthiness.

Industry Reaction

Automotive trade groups have welcomed the clarity of the new rule, while some consumer‑advocacy organisations argue that the ban may limit aesthetic choices without delivering a proportional safety benefit. The debate is expected to continue as manufacturers adapt to the updated standards.

RELATED ARTICLES

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

- Advertisment -
Google search engine

Most Popular

Recent Comments